Objective:
The SayPro Evaluation Forms are essential tools designed to gather feedback from participants in order to assess the effectiveness, impact, and overall success of each of the SayPro Monthly Preventive Health Programs. These forms enable the SayPro Development Strategic Partnerships Office to gather detailed insights into the program’s strengths, areas for improvement, and the extent to which health objectives and community needs have been met. Through these evaluations, SayPro can enhance the quality of future programs, align initiatives with community needs, and ensure continuous improvement in promoting disease prevention and healthy lifestyle choices.

---

1. Purpose of SayPro Evaluation Forms

The evaluation forms serve several key purposes:

• Assessing Program Impact: To understand the overall impact of the preventive health programs, the forms collect data on whether the program achieved its objectives, such as improving participants’ knowledge about health and disease prevention.
• Gathering Participant Feedback: The forms allow participants to share their personal experiences, which helps assess the quality of the workshops, health screenings, educational sessions, and other activities.
• Identifying Areas for Improvement: By collecting both qualitative and quantitative feedback, SayPro can identify areas of the program that need refinement or adjustment to improve its future delivery.
• Measuring Knowledge Retention: The forms assess whether the participants have retained the information shared during the program and if they are more likely to adopt healthier behaviors.
• Informing Future Program Design: The feedback helps guide the design of future preventive health initiatives by aligning them more closely with the needs and preferences of the community.

---

2. Components of SayPro Evaluation Forms

A. Participant Information (Demographics)

• Purpose: This section collects basic demographic data to assess whether the program reached diverse groups within the community. It helps evaluate whether SayPro’s programs are inclusive and accessible.
• Questions include:
  • Age group (e.g., under 18, 18-30, 31-50, 51+)
  • Gender (optional)
  • Ethnicity (optional)
  • Geographic location (to determine if the program reached under-served areas)
  • Prior health knowledge (e.g., basic health knowledge, no prior knowledge, expert)

B. Program Content and Structure

• Purpose: This section gathers participant feedback about the quality and relevance of the health education provided, including the clarity, usefulness, and depth of the information shared.
• Questions include:
  • How relevant were the topics covered in the program to your personal health concerns?
  • Did the information provided meet your expectations? (Very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied)
  • Were the health topics presented in a way that was easy to understand?
  • Which topics did you find most helpful?
  • Were there any topics you would have liked to be included that were missing?

C. Program Delivery (Workshops and Health Screenings)

• Purpose: This section focuses on the delivery of the program’s activities such as workshops, health screenings, and other interventions. Feedback on the delivery helps assess how well the activities were executed.
• Questions include:
  • How would you rate the quality of the health screenings or activities provided? (Excellent, good, average, poor)
  • Were the facilitators clear and engaging during the sessions?
  • Did you have enough time to ask questions or seek clarification during the workshops?
  • Was the environment (venue, online platform, etc.) conducive to learning and participation?

D. Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change

• Purpose: This section is aimed at measuring how much knowledge participants gained from the program and whether they have adopted healthier behaviors as a result.
• Questions include:
  • Do you feel that your knowledge about disease prevention has increased after attending the program? (Yes, No, Somewhat)
  • How likely are you to apply the health tips you learned in the program to your daily life? (Very likely, somewhat likely, not likely)
  • Have you made any changes to your health habits since attending the program? (e.g., improving diet, exercising more, quitting smoking)
  • Do you feel more confident in managing your health after participating in the program? (Strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree)

E. Program Impact and Effectiveness

• Purpose: This section collects feedback on the overall impact of the program in terms of its ability to influence participants’ health behaviors, improve health outcomes, and provide useful support.
• Questions include:
  • Did the program meet your expectations in terms of providing valuable health information? (Yes, No)
  • Did you feel more motivated to make healthy lifestyle changes after the program? (Very motivated, somewhat motivated, not motivated)
  • What improvements or changes would you recommend for future health programs?
  • How effective was the program in addressing the specific health needs of your community?
  • Did you find the resources (e.g., brochures, presentations, flyers) helpful in understanding the program’s content?

F. Overall Satisfaction and Recommendations

• Purpose: This final section provides participants the opportunity to rate their overall satisfaction with the program and suggest ways to improve it in the future.
• Questions include:
  • How satisfied were you with the overall program? (Very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied)
  • Would you recommend this program to others in your community? (Yes, No)
  • What would you suggest to improve the program for future participants?
  • Do you have any other comments or feedback about the program?

---

3. Types of Feedback Collected

A. Quantitative Feedback (Closed-Ended Questions)

• These questions use rating scales or multiple-choice options to gather measurable data. For example:
  • How satisfied were you with the program? (1-5 scale)
  • Did the program meet your expectations? (Yes, No)
  • How likely are you to apply what you learned? (Very likely, somewhat likely, not likely)

B. Qualitative Feedback (Open-Ended Questions)

• These questions provide space for participants to provide more in-depth insights or personal stories, allowing SayPro to better understand participant experiences and emotional responses. For example:
  • What was the most valuable part of the program for you?
  • What suggestions do you have for improving the program in the future?

---

4. Distribution and Collection of Evaluation Forms

• During Workshops: Participants are given the evaluation forms at the end of the workshop, ensuring that the feedback is fresh in their minds.
• Online Surveys: For broader reach and more flexible participation, SayPro may offer online evaluation forms that can be filled out after virtual or community-based health events.
• Health Screenings and Vaccination Drives: Evaluation forms are distributed to participants following health screenings or vaccination drives to gather feedback on these specific activities.
• Community Centers and Health Events: At larger community events, forms can be made available at registration desks or distributed by event staff.

---

5. Analysis of Evaluation Data

Once the forms are collected, SayPro’s team conducts an in-depth analysis of both quantitative and qualitative feedback:

• Quantitative Analysis: This involves compiling numerical data (such as ratings on a scale of 1-5) to identify trends, such as which program components were most effective or which areas need improvement.
• Qualitative Analysis: Open-ended feedback is categorized and analyzed for recurring themes or suggestions. This might include comments on improving workshop content, better communication, or expanding certain health topics.
• Actionable Insights: Based on the feedback, SayPro will adjust the design and implementation of future programs to ensure they are more aligned with the community’s needs and preferences.

---

6. Reporting and Action Based on Evaluation

• Internal Reports: Detailed evaluation reports are created for the SayPro Development Strategic Partnerships Office to assess the program’s success and identify key areas for improvement. These reports also include recommendations for future program adjustments.
• Stakeholder Communication: The feedback and evaluation results are shared with external partners and stakeholders, such as local health departments and healthcare providers, to demonstrate the impact of the program and encourage further collaboration.
• Program Enhancement: SayPro uses the evaluation data to continuously improve program offerings, refine the content, and ensure that future health initiatives are even more effective in meeting community needs.

---

7. Conclusion

The SayPro Evaluation Forms play a crucial role in ensuring that the Monthly Preventive Health Programs are effective, relevant, and impactful. By gathering structured feedback from participants, SayPro can assess the success of its health initiatives, make informed decisions for future programming, and ultimately improve the health and well-being of the communities it serves. These evaluations contribute to the continuous improvement of SayPro’s health programs, ensuring that each initiative is aligned with the goal of disease prevention and promoting healthy lifestyles.